Table of Contents
- Is Wireless Technology Safe?
- What About Regulations?
- Scalar Energy
- Blushield Technology Products — True EMF Protection
- What Else Can We Do About This Silent Stress?
- What About Mainstream Studies?
- Let’s Cover Some More Studies and the Physiological Effects of Wireless Technology
- In Closing
Is Wireless Technology Safe?
If you google EMF research, you won’t actually find much. At first, wireless technology was considered only “possibly” carcinogenic.” Now, around the world, it is considered “most likely” carcinogenic. We now have enough evidence to at least take precautionary measures when it comes to this technology.
Your body is electric. Every cell in our body communicates with tiny electrical signals. To think we can put an exponential amount of microwave radiation and ignorantly not experience any adverse effects is a very deceptive illusion based on zero tangible evidence.
EMF refers to electromagnetic fields that can also be referred to as EMR (electromagnetic radiation). An EMF does not leave the source. It emits, then it collects back on itself and repeats this process. Unlike Radio Frequencies (RF) such as Wi-Fi or your phone, the EMF leaves the device and travels into “space” until it eventually dissipates.
Dissipation is actually the wrong word to use. If the radiation passes through a material, then it simply spreads out the further it goes, just as it would passing through empty space. It technically does not dissipate into nothingness, as the word would imply. All matter is transparent to some frequency of radiation or another. Where are non-native EMFs emitting from in our world today? They are radiated from radio frequencies, electric fields, magnetic fields, “dirty” electricity, and geopathic stress.
These various frequencies have slight differences, but any electrical equipment will emit similar fields. Some electrical equipment will emit single frequencies, which may not have profound short-term effects, but long-term effects showcase substantial amounts of endocrine and nervous system stress over time. In other words, it’s like dripping water; eventually, it will get on your nerves, ultimately affecting your nervous system and draining you.
Over time, it can cause our body to come out of balance and make it virtually impossible for us to shift into a parasympathetic state. Some may ask, are there beneficial EMF’s and non-beneficial EMF’s? It does depend on how the field is generated and what you are using to broadcast the signals, but virtually all of these man-made (Non-Native EMF/NN-EMF) wireless devices can be harmful. It’s the exposure; it’s the time. In regards to dirty electricity (stemming from old/poor quality outlets), we have written a blog about this. Simply opt for green-wave plug-in products. They seem to work very well with correcting this issue.
What About Regulations?
The FCC is supposed to be regulating wireless technology. The regulations are almost 20 years old, which means our most advanced technology is using science that is at least 20 years old. Not only this but it is based on a concept that is nearly 50 years old, saying, “That if microwave radiation does NOT heat us, it cannot possibly hurt us…” This is almost as childish as the artificial sweetener argument being made, which we will heavily discuss in the near future on another blog and cover a little bit of it below.
The thing is, we now have hundreds of studies that prove this to be gravely wrong. This is false information; it is outdated, and we cannot rely on such inconclusive evidence. Like many public health issues within our country, you have industry influencing the regulatory body (FCC). Both the “science” and the FCC commission are heavily influenced by industry funding, such as cellular/wireless companies.
There is a study by Dr. Henry Lai that looked at 326 studies based on the biological effects of cellphone radiation. He found that about half of the studies showed effects and half did not, which is fairly normal with studies. What he found was interesting: if you look at who funded the studies, 70% of the independent studies showed effects, and only 32% of the industry-funded studies showed effects. There is obviously an influence of money on this topic as there is also a ton of censorship on high-quality concrete evidence with an opposing “It’s Safe, Trust Us” narrative constantly being pushed.
To each physical thing in the world, there is a non-physical counterpart. People have a body, which is physical, and a spirit, which is non-physical. Likewise, electromagnetic fields have a readable field and a non-readable field. This non-readable field can easily be picked up by living systems, and generally, that is what affects the body, not so much the magnetic field but the scalar or information counterpart to that electromagnetic field.
Scalar can penetrate through 6 meters of solid concrete and 6 feet of solid steel. Scalar moves at the sub-atomic level, where there is a space between these atoms. That is where this field moves through, and you cannot protect yourself or shield yourself from EMF. There are copious amounts of overly-hyped and deceptively marketed EMF mitigation devices, such as stickers and pendants, that are questionable at best in their efficacy.
When it comes to EMF devices, there are, in fact, a lot of bogus devices out there. We even learned recently from several RF specialists on the interwebs that many Trifield meters are bogus and tampered with to over-exaggerate EMF readings/detection. While this is important to note, many RF specialists rely on this notion and use it as a means of somehow debunking the entire ethos of EMF toxicity and suddenly becoming experts in biochemistry and deeming every electronic device to be virtually safe and harmless! While this is cute, it’s only a percentage of the entire picture.
Thank God we have actual scientists and biochemists around the world agreeing that the future of technology needs to steer HARD in the right direction, and it’s our duty to help push the message about the dangers of wireless technology. The thing is, the electromagnetic fields are only ONE component of the problem; the scalar field is actually 5x more powerful than the EMF field. Living systems pick it up, but you cannot detect it. It’s the way these fields are emitted that the damage is being done. Mark Langdon believes the consequences are far-reaching and that within five generations from now, if we do not do anything to protect our DNA from EMF, there will be birth deformities and mutations within the human genome that could be irreversible. This is why it’s so essential to protect ourselves at a cellular level.
Blushield Technology Products — True EMF Protection
The only way we can truly mitigate this environmental, silent stressor without just turning off the signals and going in nature is by utilizing a Blushield device. Other devices, such as a pendant or a little EMF-blocking sticker, try to literally “Block EMF,” and this is impossible. You need to produce a scalar field strong enough to penetrate every cell in the human body to give life-enhancing frequencies to protect and nurture the body so the cells are free to uptake nutrients and remove cellular debris/waste. EMF can reduce oxygen uptake in the cell and also flood the cell with calcium via calcium channels in the cells.
We have used many Blushield products and were skeptical for many years due to the poor information out there and lack of understanding of scalar energy, but we have known a very noticeable difference when utilizing Blushield devices around heavy traffic areas with lots of Wi-Fi signals, cellular signals, etc. Just because you don’t “feel” anything does not mean it is working or having an effect on your physiology.
How do you know these frequencies are not doing any harm? Well, the body is adept at picking up many frequencies from nature, from the forest, and from the ocean. The waves crashing, the rustling of the wind through the leaves, not just the static frequency of the earth (7.38HZ), but the dynamic frequencies throughout nature. If you are outside and exposed to these frequencies, you feel great when you hear the leaves rustling from the wind, the trees moving, the waves crashing; all of these are naturally occurring frequencies.
These frequencies are similar to how Blushield works. The body initially responds positively to actually all frequencies, even to those considered harmful long term. Again, the problem with the entire argument is that many people focus simply on short-term effects; it’s the long-term exposure we must be aware of, whether it be 5, 10, or 15+ years. The frequencies that make a negative impact on the body are the ones that are there for more than 15 seconds; if they are spontaneous, they have a positive effect. It’s the ebb and flow of the tide, the waves, the leaves, the wind, etc. This is just enough to keep the body in a relaxed but alert state. The body never gets used to these because they are always changing.
The Blushield technology is similar; the algorithm is always changing the frequencies and pulses spontaneously every few seconds or so. This makes Blushield the best possible EMF device that is out there. Nothing even comes close. Many deal with Schumann frequencies: one machine for love, one for happiness, one for health, one for wealth, etc. Why not just have one device? That is the claim behind Blushield. We like the Blushield portable pocket device, the watch, and the home unit.
Nathan gave his home unit to his dad, rightfully so, as he is exposed to far more signals where he lives. Either way, even if you are not surrounded by copious amounts of signals, Blushield works exceptionally well as a device that basically allows your cells to relax and do the work that they need to do. In other words, Blushield emits frequencies that enhance “healing,” recovery, and repair.
Check out this study about a test involving a male in his mid-thirties who was consistently exposed to high levels of EMF. Like many men in modern times, he was in close proximity to electrical equipment all day and spent many hours with computers, game consoles, Wi-Fi, etc. He did not exercise and also had a very toxic diet. He was given a Blushield portable to carry around with him at all times. A Blushield plug-in model was also placed in his home and was utilized 24/7. No other changes were made.
Results: “Lymphocytes went from 25 to 15, showing a normalization of the immune system. This is reflected in the blood. Obvious changes are apparent, and the walls of the blood cells have normalized within a very short period of time.“ This was very noticeable and pleasantly surprising to the tester. There were substantially reduced levels of inflammation and oxidation, which is remarkable considering no other changes were made. (Source)
What Else Can We Do About This Silent Stress?
Needless to say, when it comes to Blushield, we like it, we buy it, we believe in it, and we definitely promote it. Could it be a placebo, maybe, but most likely not. The research is there, and there are lots of it.
The first thing is to make sure that we use our cell phones wisely and not put them within an inch of the body. The industry is now telling us this. Avoid placing a laptop or tablet on your lap or near you. Unplug TVs and other various electronics when not in use. Use a speakerphone, get an air tube headset, and put it on airplane mode if it’s in your pocket or bra. Do not let kids use cell phones. If they do, teach them to use it wisely. Avoid using a baby monitor at night (some moms have recommended Bebcare to us as it is apparently “ultra-low radiation). Use direct link, fiber optic, and ethernet plug-in adapters for your phones, iPads, etc.
We do not need Wi-Fi in schools; we need wired. Especially for the growing population, as Dr. Jack Kruse has stated, their brains are still developing and are not fully myelinated; they do not have the protection necessary as adults do to prevent what could possibly yield irreversible damage. If you constantly irradiate their brain without protection, you are going to cause some significant mylanear damaging collateral effects down the road. Create a safe place to sleep. Cellular and wireless signal-related injuries are more common than you might think. Just simply search (if it’s not c ens o red by now) “S m a r t Meter Injuries.”
What About Mainstream Studies?
A lot of people only focus on one aspect of health research, and that is often more than not, revolving entirely around whether or not something is carcinogenic. When it comes to something being carcinogenic or not, this is a very one-dimensional and inexperienced approach to health. Mainstream studies actually now agree that your cell phone and other various devices are highly carcinogenic (of course, distance and exposure time matter).
The fact that many institutions base the safety of a product on this rating can be fairly absurd at times, in the sense that there is so much more to the picture. Humans want absolution, and for some reason, a good portion of the scientific community likes to base their “absolute and conclusive evidence” on the idea of a specific product, chemical, or even isolated substance causing or not causing a specific disease. They practically say, “Because it does not cause ‘x’ or ‘y’ disease, it is now deemed completely safe, and anyone who opposes the ‘science’ is a tin foil hat bigot.”
Dr. Ray Peat, Ph.D., actually discusses something similar to this in further detail on the topic of artificial sweeteners and certain isolated amino acids. Check this excerpt out:
“We have to remember that the arguments made for aspartame, monosodium glutamate, aspartic acid, and tryptophan–that they are like the amino acids that make up natural proteins–are dangerously false. In the case of amino acids, balance is everything. Aspartic and glutamic acids promote seizures and cause brain damage, and are intimately involved in the process of stress-induced brain aging, and tryptophan by itself is carcinogenic. Treating any complex natural product as the drug industry does, as a raw material to be fractionated in the search for “drug” products, is risky, because the relevant knowledge isn’t sought in the search for an association between a single chemical and a single disease.”
The first part of this quote from Dr. Peat is obviously somewhat irrelevant to this blog, but the latter bolded portion is the kind of mindset we want others within the scientific community to consider utilizing more of. Critical thinking is a skill that requires effort and practice. We have to remember that truth is not subjective, and there are half-truths everywhere. We have to be careful and not always assume we have absolution of certain knowledge.
Of course, with science, context does matter more often than not. Unfortunately, many people opt for intellectual laziness (Acedia) or perhaps just fail to include the whole picture in order to gain some form of absolution or conclusion, more often than not based on a preferred outcome, a personal bias, or an agenda. We understand that money has always influenced the direction of certain forms of politics and science, but since when have they become so based on emotion?
We have met many people who base their scientific beliefs on an inconclusive study or discussion that confirms their personal bias without understanding both sides of the coin. They do their research, they find what they are looking for, and then they stop there. Basically, they’ve figured it out. Is this perhaps a form of cognitive dissonance? Like Neo in The Matrix said, they are unable to accept reality, so people just decide to take the blue pill. Trust us, we wish the damaging effects of certain things weren’t as they seem to be (with based research).
The goal is not to be neurotic but rather to simply be empowered, to be aware, to be able to take the necessary measures needed in order to regain one’s health and, most importantly, to protect our future offspring. Yes, placebo is a powerful phenomenon. The mind is incredibly capable of directing our lives and the state of our overall well-being and physiology, for that matter. This is why studies are important, and luckily, we have a lot of them. We’ve only listed a few.
We like to back up all of our research and claims. When we are ever wrong, which of course we have been in the past, then we simply redact statements, we admit it, and we do our best to change, etc. We are in the business of helping others by maximizing results and performance, and if our information doesn’t do that, then what’s the point? Let’s just try to avoid throwing the baby out with the bath water when it comes to research.
Let’s Cover Some More Studies and the Physiological Effects of Wireless Technology
If the wavelength of the specific EMF source is the same as or shorter than the cell diameter, then the waves can get inside the cell and wreak havoc. With 2.4Ghz, I think larger cell types (such as liver cells) are more at risk, but with 5 G signals, which are in the 20 Ghz-60 Ghz range, pretty much all cells are fair game. This was the rationale and mechanism of action proposed in the recent (now retracted, after a huge media backlash) paper proposing 5 G signals can generate c 0 r 0 n a v ! r u $ particles de-novo in the organism without ANY external infection. RETRACTED: 5 G Technology and induction of c 0 r 0 n a v ! r u $ in skin cells – PubMed
Non-native (Man-Made) Electromagnetic frequencies have been directly linked to Infertility, DNA Damage, and Cancer; if we are not mistaken, there are over 70 active lawsuits currently against wireless companies, most of them involving brain cancer and more.
Common Wireless Symptoms:
- Insomnia / Sleep Disturbance
- Ear Ringing / Tinnitus
- Cognitive Disturbances
- Irritability / Stress
- Source, Dr. Federica Lamech, Paper Published 2014
“Some of the electromagnetic low energy radiation break chromosomes, it is a matter how they resonate, for example, men working around power lines have very few male offspring, birds living near those same power lines have fewer female offspring, this is apparently from cellular and chromosome damage from those low frequency emissions. In the 1950’s The Russians knew the effect that EMF had on the brain, and began lowering their safety standards for that type of radiation because of the effect of inheritance on lowering fertility.” – Dr. Peat Ph.D
Most schools, hospitals, and even several churches now have cell towers on them. Little 5g nodes and repeaters are popping up in small/big towns and cities all over the place, not just on buildings but on street corners placed on posts every few blocks or so. You may be asking, “Perhaps some people might be experiencing symptoms or even injury, but why am I not feeling these symptoms?” Again, just because you do not experience symptoms does not mean that there is not a change occurring on a physiological/cellular level. Your environment is key. We have tons of research on this and the effects of grounding as well.
Some people just say to turn off your Wi-Fi repeater/extender and/or just keep your Wi-Fi Router set to 2.45 GHz, right? Check this interesting study out:
Hepatic injury induced by radio frequency waves emitted from conventional Wi-Fi devices in Wistar rats:
“In this study, the impact of standard 2.45 GHz radio frequency source (averaged whole-body specific absorption rate 0.01 W kg−1 24 h−1 daily for 40 consecutive days) on the liver of Wistar female rats was investigated. The rats were randomly divided into control and Wi-Fi–exposed groups. At the end of the exposure, liver samples were dissected from rats. Rats’ livers were inspected through the evaluation of some oxidative stress parameters and the evaluation of glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase and glutamic-pyruvic transaminase levels as well as through the molecular investigation using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Histopathological examination in addition to ultrastructure examination was also performed. The present data revealed that Wi-Fi exposure leads to severe oxidative stress in the rat liver. Furthermore, Wi-Fi exposure resulted in deleterious effects in the liver function and alters its molecular structure. Moreover, severe histological and ultrastructural alterations are reported in the hepatic tissues point to hepatotoxic effects induced by Wi-Fi exposure. In conclusion, care must be taken when using Wi-Fi emitting devices due to their severe impact on the liver. Public awareness of the need to decrease exposure time and increase the distance from Wi-Fi exposure sources must be raised wherever possible.” (Source)
Check this one out as well (we have more down below; simply click the link for some valuable resources):
“In this study, we aimed to investigate the possible protective effects of caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) on lipid peroxidation (LPO) and the activities of antioxidant enzymes in the liver of rats exposed to the 900 MHz electromagnetic field (EMF). EMF of cellular phones may affect biological systems by increasing free radicals, which appear mainly to enhance LPO, and by changing the antioxidative activities of the liver, thus leading to oxidative damage. CAPE, an active component of
propolis extract, exhibits antioxidant properties and several studies suggest that supplementation with antioxidants can influence EMF exposure induced hepatotoxicity. Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into three groups: control (n = 10), 900 MHz EMF (n = 10) and 900 MHz EMF + CAPE (n = 10). CAPE was injected intraperitoneally for 30 days before exposure to EMF. Liver tissue was removed to study the activities of catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), xanthine oxidase (XO) and the levels of LPO. The activities of XO, CAT and level of LPO increased in the 900 MHz electromagnetic field (EMF) group compared with the control group, although XO, CAT activities and LPO levels were decreased by 900 MHz EMF + CAPE administration. The activities of SOD and GSH-Px decreased in the 900 MHz EMF group compared with the control group, although their levels were increased by EMF + CAPE administration. It can be concluded that CAPE may prevent the 900 MHz EMF-induced oxidative changes in the liver by strengthening the antioxidant defense system by reducing reactive oxygen species and increasing antioxidant enzyme activities.”
Use technology less, use airplane mode more, keep technology away from your body, mitigate dirty electricity, utilize a Blushield/scalar energy device to help mitigate NN-EMF, spend more time outside in nature, the forest, the ocean, etc. Ground your feet outside more often than not. Turn off Wi-Fi at night, and unplug your router, your TV, and other various electronics. Avoid using AirPods; use tubeless headphones instead, and avoid Bluetooth headsets. Use magnesium bicarbonate and magnesium chloride spray to counteract EMF toxicity (flooding our cells with calcium).
Nick & Nathan
- Dr. Federica Lamech, Paper Published 2014
- RETRACTED: 5 G Technology and induction of c 0 r 0 n a v ! r u $ in skin cells – PubMed
* This post contains affiliate link(s) or codes. An affiliate link or code means I may earn advertising/referral fees if you make a purchase through my link, without any extra cost to you. It helps to keep our small business afloat. Thanks for your support.